On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 11:43 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom, Karel,
>
> > Hmm, if we want to support conversion like:
> > '43 hours 20 minutes' --> 'MI min'
> > how we should work with calendar INTERVAL units? For example 'month'?
> > '1 month 1 day' --> 'D days'
> > I think answer should be error message: "missing calendar unit 'month'
> > in output format"
>
> Actually, there's a pretty well-defined boundary within interval types:
> year.month | day.hour.minute.second.millesecond
Yes.
> This subtype boundary of intervals is even defined in the SQL spec.
>
> > Surely not. to_char for timestamps doesn't require that you output
> > every field of the value, and it shouldn't require that for intervals
> > either.
>
> That's an invalid comparison. There is no logical way to "roll up" timestamps
> into larger/smaller subtypes. There is with intervals.
Agree. There is two possible way how you can convert it:
a) extract and convert
'1h 10min 30s' --- 'MI "min"' ---> '10 min'
b) hold the interval and convert it to defined units
'1h 10min 30s' --- 'MI "min"' ---> '70.5 min'
> If you're arguing that this kink in the *useful* behavior of interval-->text
> conversion is confusingly inconsistent with what to_char does with other data
> types, and we should call the function something else, then I could
> potentially buy that (assuming that others agree). However, our proprietary
> functions are about being *useful*, not adhering to some unwritten de-facto
> standard. And I am, as someone who uses intervals heavily in applications,
> trying to define what the useful behaviour will be from a user's perspective.
I agree with Josh that for interval is more useful second way where
result from conversion is still useful interval.
There is no problem implement both, to_char() stuff already supports
global options and I can add for INTERVAL option 'EX' as extract.
a) to_char('1h 10min 30s', 'EXMI "min"') -> '10 min'
b) to_char('1h 10min 30s', 'MI "min"') -> '70.5 min'
BTW, for numbers to_char() disable extraction:
test=# select to_char(123.4::float, '.999');to_char
--------- .###
the result is not '.4'. I think important is always tradition how people
work with selected datetype. For TIMESTAMP is it common that you work
with extraction from full date/time description, but it's unusual for
numbers and I think for INTERVALs too.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>
