Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql
Date
Msg-id 1110924781.6585.38.camel@jd2.commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql  (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>)
Responses Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql
List pgsql-general
> Also, a 32-bit machine can only hold so much RAM. If I'm correct, there
> are ways to address more memory than that on a 32 bit machine, but I
> wonder at what cost? In other words, is it a good idea to address more
> than 4GB on a 32 bit machine? If not, is it a reasonable choice to
> invest in 64 bit if you want >4GB of RAM? Or are you better off just
> spending the money on RAID and staying at 4GB?

It entirely depends on the database but not that the 32bit limit of 4GB
is per CPU. So if you have 4 CPUs you can have 16GB of ram.

However, you should be running Opterons anyway.

J


>
> Regards,
>     Jeff Davis
>
> PS: A minor typo in "Disk and WAL" -> "checkpoint_segments":
> s/Depening/Depending/
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
Command Prompt, Inc., Your PostgreSQL solutions company. 503-667-4564
Custom programming, 24x7 support, managed services, and hosting
Open Source Authors: plPHP, pgManage, Co-Authors: plPerlNG
Reliable replication, Mammoth Replicator - http://www.commandprompt.com/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: plpython function problem workaround
Next
From: Paul Moore
Date:
Subject: Re: New user: Windows, Postgresql, Python