On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 04:46, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > I've attached a revised patch which fixes the problem, however I'm sure there
> > is a better way. Thanks to Neil for putting up with me on irc :-)
>
> How about calling the savepoint pg_psql_savepoint instead, that way it
> follows our 'don't begin things with pg_' philosophy.
>
I was actually thinking of calling it something like
pg_<xact-start-time> thinking that would be pretty unique within a
transaction, though having a specific documented name seemed ok too.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
