Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Raphael Hertzog (hertzog@debian.org) wrote:
>> Still I believe that this issue should be fixed in both sides. It's not
>> smart from PostgreSQL to call fsync() when it has not made any change.
> Why?
My thought about this is just to ignore EINVAL when fsync'ing a directory,
as we already do with EBADF.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs