Re: MySQL 5 comparison - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Subject | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1105022405.15259.1280.camel@camel Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: MySQL 5 comparison (Robert Bernier <robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca>) |
Responses |
Re: MySQL 5 comparison
|
List | pgsql-advocacy |
Well, I think those of us in the pg community would be interested in reading it, but IMHO it's a losing proposition for SRA to push articles that highlight the negativities of other database systems. If you're going to go down that road you had better tread carefully; personally I would stick to articles that highlight customer successes. Robert Treat On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 09:11, Robert Bernier wrote: > Guys, > > I sent an email to Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at> and asked if he > could give me particulars about the bench marking he did. Could I have some > comments about the idea of making a more structured presentation in an > article, in the next SRA newsletter, http://sraapowergres.com ? > > > On January 6, 2005 08:45 am, you wrote: > > > Has anyone spent any time with the MySQL 5.0 alpha, set to go into > > > > beta > > > > > shortly > > > > (http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/01/04/HNmysql5beta_1.html)? > > > > > Would be interesting to have a rudimentary comparison checklist - not > > > > so > > > > > much benchmarks, as features, as they seem to have added a lot. And > > > > any > > > > > info on how they've implemented these features (e.g. multiple table > > > > types > > > > > in order to use different features, etc.) would be of interest. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Ned > > > > Putting my advocacy hat on, > > If you look at their description of the upcoming features, it's > > saturated with words like 'basic', 'initial', and 'rudimentary'. I > > don't think mysql 5.0 will be a watershed moment where it will become > > the database of choice for industrial application development... > > > > The new stuff on a point by point feature comparison may look > > impressive, but they need to work on internal stuff like the locking > > engine, get some real logging etc. > > > > On a more even handed note, it's nice to see them get some real > > features. Open source success stories are not zero-sum, so what's good > > for them is not necessarily bad for us. Competition is good, but pg is > > at least 3 years ahead of them in development! > > > > Merlin > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
pgsql-advocacy by date: