Re: Corrupt RTREE index - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: Corrupt RTREE index
Date
Msg-id 1103071168.28882.64.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Corrupt RTREE index  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 14:12 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> IS this same issue true for hash or GiST indexes?

Yes, it is: currently, only btree indexes are WAL safe.

(I spent some time recently looking into adding page-level concurrency
and WAL to GiST, but I haven't had a chance to finish that work -- it is
quite a big job...)

-Neil



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance suggestions?
Next
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: Corrupt RTREE index