Re: merging advocacy and "overview" - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Date
Msg-id 1102007412.2558.63.camel@camel
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: merging advocacy and "overview"  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
List pgsql-www
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 11:57, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >>>                    members{a}
> >>
> >>
> >> Doesn't this duplicate the developer site portion?
> >>
> >>>                         corporate{a}
> >>
> >>
> >> We'll need to come up with some rules on who can appear here.  My
> >> thoughts:
> >> 1) Anyone who sponsors a full-time or 1/2 time developer;
> >> 2) Anyone who has sponsored a significant feature in the last 3
> >> versions.
> >
> >
> > Not sure if I agree with a 'time limit' on this one ... there should
> > be some sort of 'history' section ... if we are remembering a
> > contribution, it should be remembered, not 'fade out over time' ...
>
>
> I think Marc has an interesting point. The other issue is what about
> companies who may not sponsor a ton of code but troll the mailing lists?
> Or provide major services like hosting? Or secondary code like the .Net
> provider?
>

This is why we never came up with a guideline...

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Links for press page ... where will these things be?