Re: Anyone got time to review an article? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Date
Msg-id 1101318725.12988.5.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anyone got time to review an article?  (Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com>)
Responses Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
List pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 07:32, Tom Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 13:40, Michael Paesold wrote:
> > What I found quite irritating is that the forum posts below ("PostgreSQL
> > Forum") are not about PostgreSQL but really MS SQL, i.e. the MS SQL forum is
> > linked into this article. If you look at the available database forums, you
> > will see that there is no PostgreSQL forum (but e.g. a MySQL one).
> >
> > Perhaps you can point that out to the Databasejournal people so the would
> > fix it.
>
> There's a PostgreSQL forum up now:
>
> http://forums.databasejournal.com/forumdisplay.php?s=53f8cab16be0ade340079ed45a58c270&forumid=2

But at the bottom of the article, when you click on the "PostgreSQL
forum" you still get the MSSQL forum.

The poor little PostgreSQL forum there is dying from lack of attention,
with only two posts total ever...


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Tom Copeland
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Next
From: Tom Copeland
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?