Re: Anyone got time to review an article? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Tom Copeland
Subject Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Date
Msg-id 1101306923.8976.7.camel@hal
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anyone got time to review an article?  ("Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 23:39, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I'm on vacation, so I don't have the ability to test the actual SQL.
>   The
> article text is fine.    You might want to, in future articles, suggest
> that
> people run EXPLAIN ANALYZE and not just EXPLAIN in order to see when
> the
> query planner is estimating wrong.

Ah, good idea, thanks.

> BTW, the queries that GForge uses to generate the category counts for
> the
> trove map are egregiously bad and generate wrong counts to boot.
>  They're
> basically a loop of queries, one *per category*, when the whole thing
> could
> be done in a single query.

Heh... I bet that's not the only set of hideous queries in there.  Ah
well... onwards and upwards...

> I've been meaning to fix this for some
> time,
> but I got hung up on getting GForge installed on my dev machine.  Maybe
> later ...

Maybe I can catch up with you on #postgresql sometime and we can sort of
some of those problems...

Yours,

Tom


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Tom Copeland
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?