On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 00:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > A possibly more reliable interlock would involve having the postmaster
> > probe during normal startup to see if there is already an archived WAL
> > segment for what it thinks is the current segment.
>
> Another and simpler way is to recommend that people use archive_command
> strings that won't overwrite an existing archive file.
>
Yes, exactly what I meant by saying I'd document the warning.
--
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
