Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: semicolon not required on END statement - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: semicolon not required on END statement
Date
Msg-id 1096606408.9055.1.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: semicolon not required on END statement  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: semicolon not required on END statement  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tree view 
On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 13:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> We specifically do not require a semicolon at the very end of the
> function definition.

Yeah, makes sense. Attached is a doc patch. Barring any objections I'll
apply it to HEAD by end-of-day today.

-Neil
Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: semicolon not required on END statement
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: PLPGSQL and FOUND stange behaviour after EXECUTE