Re: Others applying patch queue patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: Others applying patch queue patches
Date
Msg-id 1095735660.8747.223.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Others applying patch queue patches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Others applying patch queue patches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 13:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> In my mind this is just a clearer statement of what the policy always
> was ;-).  The patch review/application load was never supposed to fall
> entirely on Bruce.  The list he maintains is just there to ensure that
> nothing slips through the cracks.

Sounds good. Before I apply a patch from -patches, I send a mail saying
"I intend to apply the patch in xyz hours", or the like. Is the presence
of the patch on Bruce's pending patches list sufficient notice that it
is going to be applied, or should I send mail in this case as well?

-Neil




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: signal 11 on AIX: 7.4.2
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: RSS