Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
Date
Msg-id 10901.1129502304@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas  (Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com>)
List pgsql-general
Chris Travers <chris@verkiel.metatrontech.com> writes:
> I make the following assumptions:

> 1)  All backend references to identifiers are treated as quoted by the
> backend as mentioned in a previous thread.
> 2)  Same with official clients like psql.
> 3)  We don't guarantee complete backward compatibility in the system
> catalogs anyway (note that this is a trivial problem to solve if 1 above
> is solved-- schemas, views, and rules can accomplish some cool tricks
> :-) ).

None of these assumptions are acceptable, particularly not #2.  In
reality #2 is a proxy for "I'm willing to break all existing clients
that look at the system catalogs".  Which we're not.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Next
From: Martín Marqués
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase