Re: Point in Time Recovery - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Point in Time Recovery
Date
Msg-id 1089963643.17493.7882.camel@stromboli
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Point in Time Recovery  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 04:49, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 00:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> My manpage for signal(2) says that you shouldn't assign SIG_IGN to
> >> SIGCHLD, according to POSIX.
> 
> > So - I should be setting this to SIG_DFL and thats good for everyone?
> 
> Yeah, we learned the same lesson in the backend not too many releases
> back.  SIG_IGN'ing SIGCHLD is bad voodoo; it'll work on some platforms
> but not others.

Many thanks all, Best Regards Simon Riggs






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Glaesemann
Date:
Subject: Re: Converting epoch to timestamp
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: serverlog rotation/functions