Re: [Re] Re: Dump 7.1.3->7.4.2 - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Keith C. Perry |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [Re] Re: Dump 7.1.3->7.4.2 |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1086302676.40bfa9d452665@webmail.vcsn.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | [Re] Re: Dump 7.1.3->7.4.2 ("Cyril VELTER" <cyril.velter@metadys.com>) |
List | pgsql-general |
Quoting Cyril VELTER <cyril.velter@metadys.com>: > De : mailto:netadmin@vcsn.com > Emission : 02/06/2004 15:59:31 > > > Quoting Cyril VELTER <cyril.velter@metadys.com>: > > > From: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> > > > > On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 07:57:01AM +0200, Cyril VELTER wrote: > > > > > From: "Doug McNaught" <doug@mcnaught.org> > > > > > > "Cyril VELTER" <cyril.velter@metadys.com> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to dump a database from a 7.1.3 server to a 7.4.2 > one. > > > > > > > It doesn't works because of difference in COPY format (unless I > > > > > > > use -d which is VERY slow on a 16G database). > > > > > > > > > > > > Try using the 7.4.2 version of pg_dump to dump out the 7.1.3 > > > > > > database. pg_dump is written to talk to multiple versions of the > > > > > > server, and it's generally recommended to use the same version of > > > > > > pg_dump as the server you're restoring into. > > > > > > > > > > That's what I already do, but the problem is in COPY TO format > > > > > (which is handled by the backend ? right ?) > > > > > > > > What backend? 7.4-pg_dump will generate 7.4-backend's compatible > > > > input, and the 7.1-backend does not interact at all --- save with > > > > 7.4-pg_dump, which will make itself understood easily ... > > > > > > > > Lots of people (including me) use this procedure to upgrade rather > > > > smoothly. What's your problem exactly? > > > > > > Thanks for your response, > > > > > > Perhaps I'm mistaken, but it seems that pg_dump (the 7.4 one) will > send > > > a COPY to STDOUT command to the 7.1 backend and blindly copy the output > to > > > the dump file. > > > > > > Here's the kind of errors I get : > > > > > > ERROR: literal carriage return found in data > > > HINT: Use "\r" to represent carriage return. > > > CONTEXT: COPY c244, line 221: "662188 1002 1002 2002-08-05 > > > 12:15:12.20+00 2002-08-05 12:15:12.20+00 274 0000 > > > 01000100202010000000000..." > > > > > > By looking more closely in the dump file, there is a CR (embedded in > a > > > text field) which is not encoded and confuse the restore > > > > > > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding you but are you saying you already have the > dump > > file? If not (of if you can connect to the 7.1.3 server with the 7.4.x > dump > > program), you can, over tcp/ip, dump the data from 7.1.3 to a file and > then > > reload that file into your 7.4.x cluster. I've upgraded 7.1.3 to 7.4 and > 7.4.1 > > this way after I found out that the 7.4 pg_dump had problem reading the > 7.1.3 > > file. This is way folks are saying its best to use the dump utils from > your > > destination cluster (7.4.2 in your case) to move your data. > > > > I've two postgres instances on two different machines (one is 7.1.3 under > cygwin the other 7.4.2 under linux). I use the 7.4 pg_dump binary under linux > > to dump the 7.1 database either to a file to inspect it or piped to the 7.4 > psql connected to the 7.4 database. > > I hope this is more clear. > > I've worked out a solution which I have only tested on some tables. I use > sed > to replace embeded cr by the escaped form (\r). Will test this out with the > complete database. > > > Perhaps it's because of cygwin ? > > Thanks, > > Cyril > > Not so much cygwin but the fact that the newline characters are different maybe? -- Keith C. Perry, MS E.E. Director of Networks & Applications VCSN, Inc. http://vcsn.com ____________________________________ This email account is being host by: VCSN, Inc : http://vcsn.com
pgsql-general by date: