Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up
Date
Msg-id 10832.1556933383@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 10:29 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> +      Tolerate <literal>EINVAL</literal> and <literal>ENOSYS</literal>
> +      error results, where appropriate, for fsync calls (Thomas Munro,
> +      James Sewell)

> Nit-picking: ENOSYS is for sync_file_range, EINVAL is for fsync.

Yeah, I didn't really think it was worth distinguishing.  If there
is some more general term that covers both calls, maybe we should
use that?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: improving wraparound behavior