Peter,
It would be great if you could supply a test case which exhibits this
behaviour.
Dave
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:10, Peter Schuller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Tonight I rewrote a part of an application that deals with http uploads,
> because it turned out it has to handle larger files than originally intended
> - and one was getting OutOfMemory errors.
>
> So I rewrote evcerything so that an InputStream is passed to the JDBC driver
> and the files are never completely loaded into memory. However I am still
> getting an OutOfMemory error for large files. While it is difficult to
> pinpoint exactly where due to the lack of a stack trace, it does look like
> the driver is causing it.
>
> Does the JDBC driver handle InputStream:s intelligently at all? If so, does it
> do so under all circumstances? In this case I am putting data into a column
> of type 'bytea' and am using PreparedStatement.setBinaryStream().
>
> The backend is PostgreSQL 7.4.1, and I am using the driver for 7.4.1
> (pg74.1jdbc3.jar). Running under JDK 1.4.2.
>
> Do I need to use some other type in the database in order for input streams to
> be handled properly? Do I have to use some PostgreSQL specific API? Does the
> JDBC driver need to be changed to support this?
>
> I can always fall back to using files on the filesystem, but then I will loose
> all the niceties that come with ACID transactions which I automatically get
> if I keep it all in the database.
>
> Thanks!
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561
