Re: Pl/Java - next step? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Pl/Java - next step?
Date
Msg-id 1077473268.1642.252.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pl/Java - next step?  ("Thomas Hallgren" <thhal@mailblocks.com>)
Responses Re: Pl/Java - next step?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Not to minimize your work, as I think it is great, but this particular
use-case I consider to be overkill for pl/java. It is probably easier to
use pl/pgsql if all you want to do is calculations.

We had suggested an online chat to discuss this, when would you be
available for that? What timezone are you in. Laszlo is in hungary, and
I am in canada, so we are likely spread allover the the map .

Dave


On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 12:28, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> > 1) Using JNI, you probably still want to communicate with another
> > running java process.
> 
> B.T.W. I don't really agree on "probably". There are numerous cases when you
> will be happy just communicating with the database, communicate with another
> remote resource (message queue typically), or not communicate at all
> (calculations, etc.).
> 
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
> 
> 
-- 
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas Hallgren"
Date:
Subject: Re: Pl/Java - next step?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/perl thoughts