Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...
Date
Msg-id 1077206712.25444.44.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...  ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I vote for the GUC. Imho it is not comparable to the "autocommit" case,
> since it does not change the way your appl needs to react (appl needs to
> react to deadlock already).

Wrote one program a while ago that was very time sensitive. By the time
deadlock detection had been kicked off, the data was already invalid and
due to be replaced -- thus, it's impossible to have deadlocks with the
chosen design for that application.


The point is, PostgreSQL is fairly versatile and is a component of many
different environments. Method X might be great for what you're doing,
but it doesn't apply across the board.

The regex GUC doesn't impact a majority of applications either, but it
proved catastrophic to some.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...
Next
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...