On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 19:40, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Besides UserLinux is expected to be a business friendly distro. Why does it
> assume that business wants all tools for free?
I don't think they *assume* that. They are adopting it as a stance, one
which people can "buy" into if they wish.
If others think an alternative stance is more viable, they should pursue
it.
> If I run a business and find userlinux a good model of a linux distribution
> and Qt to be a good development framework, cost of few Qt licenses for my
> proprietory apps. would be rather negligible investment. Besides that buys me
> portability to windows with support as well. The cost goes even down then..
>
> Linux is all about choice. And Userlinux is taking away from it by making one
> on behalf on business. I don't think it will sell any big.
Just don't use UserLinux if it offends you or if it's not appropriate.
UserLinux is *another* choice. It removes no existing choices.
--
Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills
http://www.openskills.com
