Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD
Date
Msg-id 1072307.1713231353@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 17:05 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I don't at all like that the tests depend on downloading new unicode
>> data. What if there was an update but I just want to test the current
>> state?

> I was mostly following the precedent for normalization. Should we
> change that, also?

It's definitely not OK for the standard test suite to include
internet access.  Seems like we need to separate "download new
source files" from "generate the derived files".

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bugs in ecpg's macro mechanism
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD