Re: Bugs in ecpg's macro mechanism - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bugs in ecpg's macro mechanism
Date
Msg-id 1071980.1713231214@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bugs in ecpg's macro mechanism  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2024-04-15 20:47:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ah, thanks.  I guess this depends on getopt_long reordering arguments
>> (since the "-o outfile" bit will come later).  That is safe enough
>> in HEAD since 411b72034, but it might fail on weird platforms in v16.
>> How much do we care about that?  (We can avoid that hazard in the
>> makefile build easily enough.)

> As moving the arguments around would just be the following, I see no reason to
> just do so.

Fair enough.  I'm inclined to include that change only in v16, though.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Add memory context type to pg_backend_memory_contexts view
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD