Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
Date
Msg-id 1072107570.1966.23.camel@camel
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
List pgsql-general
On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 13:04, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Is it more desirable to have a single java vm and communicate via RPC,
> or some other mechanism? ie sockets, or ? The alternative is to
> instantiate a java vm for every connection, this could be onerous as
> there would be considerable overhead for each java vm.
>

If you fire up the jvm at connection creation time rather than at first
pljava function call, wouldn't that make things much simpler and faster
per process?  I only ask because I'm thinking most people using pljava
should have some kind of connection pooling going on where initial
connection creation overhead is significantly minimized...

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Tables Referencing themselves As Foreign Keys