Re: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already
Date
Msg-id 10718.1100742293@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already  (Kevin HaleBoyes <khaleboyes@chartwelltechnology.com>)
Responses Re: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin HaleBoyes <khaleboyes@chartwelltechnology.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's because you're using a badly broken flex:
> % flex --version
> flex 2.5.31

> That is, configure could check the version of various tools, like
> flex, and warn if appropriate.

It does, although I find that the warnings are of little use since
people tend not to read every line of configure's output.  (We can't
make it error out, only warn, because you aren't necessarily going
to use the installed flex anyway...)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: are there any cons to linking libstdc++ with postgresql?