Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 23:19 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> For parity with unique constraints, I think that the message:
>>
>> operator exclusion constraint violation detected: %s
>>
>> should be changed to:
>>
>> conflicting key value violates operator exclusion constraint "%s"
> Done, and updated tests.
I'm starting to go through this patch now. I thought the consensus
was to refer to them as just "exclusion constraints"? I'm not seeing
that the word "operator" really adds anything.
regards, tom lane
