Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine
Date
Msg-id 1068594688.28107.16.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine  (Chris Field <cfield@affinitysolutions.com>)
Responses Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 18:32, Chris Field wrote:
> We are getting ready to spec out a new machine and are wondering about
> the wisdom of buying a quad versus a dual processor machine.  Seing as
> how postgres in not a threaded application, and this server will only be
> used for log/transaction analysis (it will only ever have a few large
> queries running).  Is there any performance to be gained, and if so is
> it worth the large cost?  Any thoughts/experience are much
> appreciated...

Since you're asking the question, I'll assume you don't have CPU
intensive queries or monstrous loads.

I'd probably invest in a Quad system with 2 chips in it (2 empty
sockets) and put the difference in funds into a few extra GB of Ram or
improved IO.

In 6 months or a year, if you start doing longer or more complex
queries, toss in the other 2 chips. So long as you don't hit a memory
limit, it'll be fine.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Anjan Dave"
Date:
Subject: Re: Server Configs
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine