Re: Tuning/performance issue... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Tuning/performance issue...
Date
Msg-id 1065234119.23288.13.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tuning/performance issue...  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Tuning/performance issue...  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Tuning/performance issue...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 21:39, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have updated the FAQ to be:
>
>       In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are
>       faster for multiple users, complex queries, and a read/write query
>       load.  MySQL is faster for SELECT queries done by a few users.
>
> Is this accurate?  It seems so.

May wish to say ... for simple SELECT queries ...

Several left outer joins, subselects and a large number of joins are
regularly performed faster in PostgreSQL due to a more mature optimizer.

But MySQL can pump out SELECT * FROM table WHERE key = value; queries in
a hurry.


I've often wondered if they win on those because they have a lighter
weight parser / optimizer with less "lets try simplifying this query"
steps or if the MYISAM storage mechanism is simply quicker at pulling
data off the disk.


Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Tuning/performance issue...
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Tuning/performance issue...