Re: State of Beta 2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: State of Beta 2
Date
Msg-id 1063805806.25251.1416.camel@haggis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: State of Beta 2  (Kaare Rasmussen <kar@kakidata.dk>)
Responses Re: State of Beta 2  (Network Administrator <netadmin@vcsn.com>)
Re: State of Beta 2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 03:45, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
[snip]
> Some people have claimed that the big commercial databases don't change their
> on-disk represantation anymore. Maybe PostgreSQL could try to aim for this
> goal. At least try to get the on-disk changes ready for 7.5 - with or without
> the functionality to use it. I think that any pg_* table changes could be
> done with a small and efficient pg_upgrade.
[snip]

I think changes in the system catalog should be separated from
changes in the physical on-disk structures (i.e. how tables and
indexes are stored).

Maybe I'm totally wrong, but ALTERing the pg_* tables during each
version upgrade should be relatively easy to script, when the phys-
ical on-disk structures have been solidified.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net
Jefferson, LA USA

The difference between drunken sailors and Congressmen is that
drunken sailors spend their own money.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Idea for improving speed of pg_restore