Re: Query problem - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Query problem |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1059315939.32716.17.camel@jester Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Query problem (pginfo <pginfo@t1.unisoftbg.com>) |
List | pgsql-performance |
Try re-arranging your join structure: , A_CARS O JOIN A_CH_CAR CHT ON (CHT.IDS=O.IDS) left outer join A_SLUJITELI SLU ON(O.IDS_SLUJITEL=SLU.IDS) left outer join A_AUTOVOZ AWT ON(O.IDS_AUTOVOZ=AWT.IDS) left outer join A_COMBOPT CB ON(O.IDS_COMBOPT=CB.IDS) left outer join A_TAPICERII TAP ON(O.IDS_TAPICERII=TAP.IDS) left outer join A_KLIENTI DST ON(O.IDS_DOSTAV=DST.IDS) left outer join A_KLIENTI PRZ ON(O.IDS_PROIZV = PRZ.IDS) WHERE O.IDS_LOCATION=TT.IDS AND O.IDS_MDL_MDF_VOL=M.IDS AND CHT.INSTIME=1059300812726 AND CHT.SES=1059300377005 and O.DOG_OR_FREE IN(0,2,3); I believe this will cause fewer rows to be used when hashing for the left outer joins. On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 07:49, pginfo wrote: > Hi , > > I am working to migrate a oracle application to pg. > I am using pg 7.3.3 on Dual PIII, 2 GB RAM,linux RedHat 7.3. > > One of my selects is working much slower as in oracle. > In this example I am using not many rows in tables. > For all the joins I have indexes. > All IDS or IDS_xxx are name. > > Pls if it is possible poit me how to fix this problem. > > I send the query and the explai analyze. > I have ran vacuum analyze full on db. > > Many thanks, > ivan. > > explain analyze select O.IDS as oids,O.IDS_MDL_MDF_VOL as > ids_mmv,M.MNAME AS MODDELNAME,M.KOD AS MODELKOD,O.IDS_COLOR,COL.MNAME > AS COLORNAME,COL.KOD AS COLORKOD, TT.IDS AS LOCIDS,TT.MNAME AS LOCNAME, > TT.KOD AS LOC_KOD ,O.IDS_DOSTAV,DST.MNAME AS DOSTAVNAME, > O.IDS_PROIZV,PRZ.MNAME as > PROIZVNAME,O.CHASSI,O.CHASSI_ACC,O.DVIGATEL,O.ORDER_NUM,O.ORDER_DATE,O.DOG_OR_FREE, > O.NALICHEN,O.DATE_PROIZV, O.DATE_IN,O.ALI,O.DATE_ALI, > O.PRICE_PAY,O.PRICE_PAY_VAL, > O.START_DATE,O.DAYS,O.END_DATE,O.COMENTAR,O.IDS_AUTOVOZ,AWT.MNAME AS > AUTOVNAME, > O.SVERKA,O.NEW_OLD,O.KM,O.START_DATE_REZ,O.END_DATE_REZ,O.IDS_SLUJITEL,SLU.KOD,NULL > AS CT_IDS, NULL AS C_NUM, O.DATE_ALI2, NULL AS C_STATE, 0 AS DAMAGE, > O.REG_NUMBER AS CARREGNUMBER,O.DATE_REG AS CARREGDATE,O.GARTYPE,2002 AS > GODINA,O.COMENTAR1, O.IDS_COMBOPT,CB.KOD AS > IDS_COMBOPT_KOD,O.REF_BG,O.DAM,O.OBEM, O.IDS_TAPICERII,TAP.KOD AS > IDS_TAPICERII_KOD,TAP.MNAME AS > IDS_TAPICERII_NAME,O.PAPKA_N,O.CEDMICAPR, O.RADIO_KOD AS > RADIO_KOD,O.KEY_KOD AS KEY_KOD,O.ALARM_KOD AS ALARM_KOD,O.BOLT_KOD AS > BOLT_KOD,M.MOST_PS, NULL AS IDS_KLIENT , NULL AS KlientName ,O.TALON_N > AS talonN,O.STATEMODIFY AS STATEMOD,O.MESTA AS MESTA,O.CENA_COLOR AS > CENA_COL,O.CENA_TAP AS CENA_TAP,M.CENA_PROD AS > MCENA_PROD,M.CENA_PROD_VAL AS > MCENA_PROD_VAL,O.CENA_MDL,O.MESTA_MDL,O.CENA_COLOR_VAL,O.CENA_TAP_VAL,O.CENA_MDL_VAL,O.VIRTUALEN,M.IDS_GRUPA,COL.MNAME_1 > AS COLMNAME1,O.DATE_PLAN_P,O.KM_PLAN_P from A_COLORS COL, A_MDL_MDF_VOL > M ,A_LOCATIONS TT, A_CARS O left outer join A_SLUJITELI SLU > ON(O.IDS_SLUJITEL=SLU.IDS) left outer join A_AUTOVOZ AWT > ON(O.IDS_AUTOVOZ=AWT.IDS) left outer join A_COMBOPT CB > ON(O.IDS_COMBOPT=CB.IDS) left outer join A_TAPICERII TAP > ON(O.IDS_TAPICERII=TAP.IDS) left outer join A_KLIENTI DST ON( > O.IDS_DOSTAV=DST.IDS) left outer join A_KLIENTI PRZ ON( O.IDS_PROIZV = > PRZ.IDS) ,A_CH_CAR CHT WHERE O.IDS_LOCATION=TT.IDS AND > O.IDS_MDL_MDF_VOL=M.IDS AND O.IDS_COLOR=COL.IDS AND CHT.IDS=O.IDS AND > CHT.INSTIME=1059300812726 AND CHT.SES=1059300377005 and O.DOG_OR_FREE > IN(0,2,3) ; > > QUERY PLAN > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Hash Join (cost=138.54..142.57 rows=2 width=2051) (actual > time=286.17..286.29 rows=2 loops=1) > Hash Cond: ("outer".ids_location = "inner".ids) > -> Hash Join (cost=137.42..141.40 rows=2 width=1971) (actual > time=285.95..286.02 rows=2 loops=1) > Hash Cond: ("outer".ids = "inner".ids_color) > -> Seq Scan on a_colors col (cost=0.00..3.12 rows=112 > width=101) (actual time=0.01..0.30 rows=112 loops=1) > -> Hash (cost=137.41..137.41 rows=2 width=1870) (actual > time=285.43..285.43 rows=0 loops=1) > -> Hash Join (cost=134.88..137.41 rows=2 width=1870) > (actual time=285.12..285.42 rows=2 loops=1) > Hash Cond: ("outer".ids = "inner".ids_mdl_mdf_vol) > -> Seq Scan on a_mdl_mdf_vol m (cost=0.00..2.34 > rows=34 width=189) (actual time=0.03..0.21 rows=34 loops=1) > -> Hash (cost=134.88..134.88 rows=2 width=1681) > (actual time=284.98..284.98 rows=0 loops=1) > -> Hash Join (cost=10.76..134.88 rows=2 > width=1681) (actual time=189.62..284.97 rows=2 loops=1) > Hash Cond: ("outer".ids = "inner".ids) > -> Hash Join (cost=9.73..128.72 > rows=1019 width=1617) (actual time=1.58..283.39 rows=1023 loops=1) > Hash Cond: ("outer".ids_proizv = > "inner".ids) > -> Hash Join (cost=7.50..108.66 > rows=1019 width=1545) (actual time=1.34..234.05 rows=1023 loops=1) > Hash Cond: > ("outer".ids_dostav = "inner".ids) > -> Hash Join > (cost=5.28..88.60 rows=1019 width=1473) (actual time=1.12..188.41 > rows=1023 loops=1) > Hash Cond: > ("outer".ids_tapicerii = "inner".ids) > -> Hash Join > (cost=2.40..67.89 rows=1019 width=1372) (actual time=0.68..145.58 > rows=1023 loops=1) > Hash Cond: > ("outer".ids_combopt = "inner".ids) > -> Hash Join > (cost=1.09..46.19 rows=1019 width=1301) (actual time=0.45..106.88 > rows=1023 loops=1) > Hash > Cond: ("outer".ids_autovoz = "inner".ids) > -> Hash > Join (cost=1.09..41.03 rows=1019 width=1189) (actual time=0.31..72.28 > rows=1023 loops=1) > > Hash Cond: ("outer".ids_slujitel = "inner".ids) > -> > Index Scan using i_cars_dog_or_free on a_cars o (cost=0.00..22.11 > rows=1019 width=1119) (actual time=0.12..37.41 rows=1023 loops=1) > > Filter: ((dog_or_free = 0) OR (dog_or_free = 2) OR (dog_or_free = 3)) > -> > Hash (cost=1.07..1.07 rows=7 width=70) (actual time=0.04..0.04 rows=0 > loops=1) > > -> Seq Scan on a_slujiteli slu (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=7 width=70) > (actual time=0.01..0.03 rows=7 loops=1) > -> Hash > (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=112) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=0 > loops=1) > -> > Seq Scan on a_autovoz awt (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=112) (actual > time=0.00..0.00 rows=0 loops=1) > -> Hash > (cost=1.25..1.25 rows=25 width=71) (actual time=0.09..0.09 rows=0 > loops=1) > -> Seq > Scan on a_combopt cb (cost=0.00..1.25 rows=25 width=71) (actual > time=0.01..0.06 rows=25 loops=1) > -> Hash > (cost=2.70..2.70 rows=70 width=101) (actual time=0.29..0.29 rows=0 > loops=1) > -> Seq Scan on > a_tapicerii tap (cost=0.00..2.70 rows=70 width=101) (actual > time=0.01..0.17 rows=70 loops=1) > -> Hash (cost=2.18..2.18 > rows=18 width=72) (actual time=0.06..0.06 rows=0 loops=1) > -> Seq Scan on > a_klienti dst (cost=0.00..2.18 rows=18 width=72) (actual > time=0.01..0.03 rows=18 loops=1) > -> Hash (cost=2.18..2.18 > rows=18 width=72) (actual time=0.07..0.07 rows=0 loops=1) > -> Seq Scan on a_klienti > prz (cost=0.00..2.18 rows=18 width=72) (actual time=0.01..0.05 rows=18 > loops=1) > -> Hash (cost=1.03..1.03 rows=2 > width=64) (actual time=0.03..0.03 rows=0 loops=1) > -> Seq Scan on a_ch_car cht > (cost=0.00..1.03 rows=2 width=64) (actual time=0.02..0.03 rows=2 > loops=1) > Filter: ((instime = > 1059300812726::bigint) AND (ses = 1059300377005::bigint)) > -> Hash (cost=1.10..1.10 rows=10 width=80) (actual time=0.07..0.07 > rows=0 loops=1) > -> Seq Scan on a_locations tt (cost=0.00..1.10 rows=10 > width=80) (actual time=0.03..0.05 rows=10 loops=1) > Total runtime: 287.61 msec > (44 rows) > > Time: 301.36 ms > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend >
Attachment
pgsql-performance by date: