Re: Table Partitioning and Rules - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Table Partitioning and Rules
Date
Msg-id 1058469725.97321.86.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Table Partitioning and Rules  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-sql
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 19:03, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Girish,
>
> > > Essentially Im trying to store a persons information in a table in the
> > > database. Since we could have millions of people, with duplicates! Ive
> > > decided we need to partition the table into segments where all people with
> > > the LastName starting from A to G will be in one table. H-N will be in
> > > another table and O-Z in the third. Ive created a VIEW that does a UNION
> on
> > > all the tables.
>
> This sounds hideously inefficient and a management headache besides.  I think
> PostgreSQL will accept up to 2 billion rows in any one table, and splitting
> stuff into 3 tables will not improve your performance ... quite the opposite.

PostgreSQL will go well beyond 2 billion rows in a table.  It just
becomes difficult to use OIDs.

pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Scott Cain
Date:
Subject: Re: OR vs UNION
Next
From: "Girish Bajaj"
Date:
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning and Rules