On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 04:05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > It would make sense to offer a "strict" mode in which the date order
> > has to be what DateStyle suggests. I'm astonished that no one seems
> > to get the point that there are also good uses for "lax" parsing.
>
> There are different kinds of lax parsing.
>
> Lax parsing is great if you can enter any of
>
> January 8, 1999
> 1999-01-08
> 1/8/1999
> 990108
> January 8 04:05:06 1999 PST
>
> and it will know what you mean, because of all these have their uses and
> are unambiguous (given a known day/month order).
Speaking just for myself (but maybe more people, based on their
support of "strict date conversion"), lax dates should be handled
by the app and have the app convert them into "strict format"
(whatever that may be, based on LOCALE or "set" statement.
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| "Oh, great altar of passive entertainment, bestow upon me |
| thy discordant images at such speed as to render linear |
| thought impossible" (Calvin, regarding TV) |
+-----------------------------------------------------------
