Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Date
Msg-id 10527.1123545540@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> So the short answer is possibly "You build the tests and we'll run 'em."

The availability of the buildfarm certainly makes it a lot more feasible
to do performance tests on a variety of platforms.  So, who wants to
knock something together?

I suppose we would usually be interested in one-time tests, rather than
something repeated every time CVS is touched.  How might that sort of
requirement fit into the buildfarm software design?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Solving the OID-collision problem
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method