Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
Date
Msg-id 1051994374.1086.13.camel@haggis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)  ("Chad Thompson" <chad@weblinkservices.com>)
Responses Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 13:53, Chad Thompson wrote:
> I have a server on a standard pc right now.
> PIII 700, 1Gig ram (SD), 40 Gig IDE, RedHat 8.0, PostgreSQL 7.3.1
>
> The database has 3 tables that just broke 10 million tuples (yeah, i think
> im entering in to the world of real databases ;-)
> Its primarly bulk (copy) inserts and queries, rarely an update.
>
> I am looking at moving this to a P4 2.4G, 2 Gig Ram(DDR), RedHat 8,
> PostgreSQL 7.3.latest
[snip]

How big do you expect the database to get?

If I may be a contrarian, if under 70GB, then why not just get a 72GB
10K RPM SCSI drive ($160) and a SCSI 160 card?  OS, swap, input files,
etc, can go on a 7200RPM IDE drive.

Much fewer moving parts than RAID, so more reliable...

--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.     Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net          |
| Jefferson, LA  USA   http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
|                                                           |
| An ad currently being run by the NEA (the US's biggest    |
| public school TEACHERS UNION) asks a teenager if he can   |
| find sodium and *chloride* in the periodic table of the   |
| elements.                                                 |
| And they wonder why people think public schools suck...   |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: brew@theMode.com
Date:
Subject: Re: why is the db so slow?
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: NOT IN doesn't use index? (fwd)