Re: select_parallel test fails with nonstandard block size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: select_parallel test fails with nonstandard block size
Date
Msg-id 10511.1473951945@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: select_parallel test fails with nonstandard block size  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: select_parallel test fails with nonstandard block size  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Well, sure, but at any reasonable value of min_parallel_relation_size
>> that won't be a factor.  The question here is whether we want the default
>> value to be platform-independent.  I notice that both config.sgml and
>> postgresql.conf.sample claim that the default value is 8MB, which this
>> discussion reveals to be a lie.  If you want to keep the default expressed
>> as "1024" and not "(8 * 1024 * 1024) / BLCKSZ", we need to change the
>> documentation.

> I don't particularly care about that.  Changing it to 8MB always would
> be fine with me.

OK, I'll take care of it (since I now realize that the inconsistency
is my own fault --- I committed that GUC not you).  It's unclear what
this will do for Peter's complaint though.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Printing bitmap objects in the debugger
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Surprising behaviour of \set AUTOCOMMIT ON