Re: [PATCHES] ALTER SEQUENCE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: [PATCHES] ALTER SEQUENCE
Date
Msg-id 1047054923.28251.51.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] ALTER SEQUENCE  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 11:27, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Does it make sense to avoid sequence name collisions if applications
> have to refer to sequence names directly?  I mean, I can imagine a case

Not at all.  Hence the thought that we might create syntax to allow
applications to refer to the table / column that the sequence (SERIAL)
is on.  This would hide the internal representation of a SERIAL...

--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ALTER SEQUENCE
Next
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: What's up with www.postgresql.org?