Re: Request for qualified column names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Request for qualified column names
Date
Msg-id 1043805724.1063.17.camel@inspiron.cramers
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Request for qualified column names  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Request for qualified column names
List pgsql-hackers
The method in question is

ResultSetMetaDate.getTableName(int column)
and while were at it

ResultSetMetaData.getSchemaName(int column)

and FWIW, the return value if not applicable is ""


Dave
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 17:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Dave Cramer says it is needed for the jdbc spec, somehow.
> 
> Does the JDBC spec really require the database to provide functionality
> that's not in the SQL spec?  I kinda doubt that.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
-- 
Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com>
Cramer Consulting



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Nigel J. Andrews"
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Cannot connect to the database (PG 7.3)
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix for log_min_error_messages