Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Date
Msg-id 10413.1123544639@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> No one is every going to do it, so we might as well make the best guess
> we have.  I think any platform where the *data* options are slower than
> the non-*data* options is broken, and if that logic holds, we might as
> well just use *data* by default if we can, which is my proposal.

Adjusting the default settings I don't have a problem with.  Removing
options I have a problem with --- and that appeared to be what you
were proposing.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method