Perhaps compression should be added to the list of protocol changes.
This way, we can allow for per packet evaluation for compression.
--
Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net>
Copeland Computer Consulting
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 21:50, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net> writes:
> > > Sounds good to me. Is it on the todo-list? (Couldn't see it there).
> >
> > Probably not; Bruce for some reason has resisted listing protocol change
> > desires as an identifiable TODO category. There are a couple of threads
> > in the pghackers archives over the last year or so that discuss the
> > different things we want to do, though. (Improving the error-reporting
> > framework and fixing the COPY protocol are a couple of biggies I can
> > recall offhand.)
>
> Listing protocol changes seemed too low-level for the TODO list, but I
> have kept the email messages. Today I updated the TODO list and added a
> section for them.
