On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:16, Hubert depesz Lubaczewski wrote:
[snip]
> anyway: what i understood is that usually the best (performance-wise),
> would be to put:
> xlog - separate - unraid'ed disk, or raid0
Unless your data is *easily* recreatable, NEVER RAID0!!
> tables - any raid, but not raid 1
> indices - any raid, but not raid 1
Why not RAID1 (mirroring)? It speeds up both reads and writes.
Things are also dependent on the RAID controller, since they
all have different strengths and weaknesses.
--
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. mailto:ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| "My advice to you is to get married: If you find a good wife, |
| you will be happy; if not, you will become a philosopher." |
| Socrates |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
