Re: default values - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

I think Felipe has a point here. I don't see any good reason why the driver's
methods can't be a SUPERSET of those specified in the JDBC standard. As long
as there's nothing forcing you to use the non-standard methods, it should be
fine. So, for those who wish to stick to the standard for portability, there
is predictable behavior; and for those who want some of the extra goodies
provided by Postgres, there are options.

-Stuart

Quoting Felipe Schnack <felipes@ritterdosreis.br>:

>   So why setUseServerSidePrepare() was implemented? This is not potable,
> not standard, not anything.
>
> On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 22:48, Barry Lind wrote:
> >
> >
> > Felipe Schnack wrote:
> > >
> > >   2- This feature is avaliable in pgsql. Why not implement it?
> > >
> > Since default column capability isn't part of the jdbc standard yet (but
> > since it is part of the SQL standard, I would expect it to be added
> > someday to the jdbc spec), adding support for it would require the user
> > to write non-portable jdbc code.  Since there is a portable way to
> > accomplish the same thing (i.e. not include the column in the insert), I
> > don't see a compelling reason to add this functionality.
> >
> > thanks,
> > --Barry
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 17:16, Stuart Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > >>Hi, Felipe.
> > >>
> > >>I'm been trying to follow the discussion about default values and I'm a
> little
> > >>confused. I think David's reply is sensible. Unless I'm missing
> something, I
> > >>don't think there's an issue for inserts. All you have to do is not
> specify the
> > >>default column in the insert and it will automatically get the default
> value. I
> > >>think the issue only arises when you do updates, if you want to revert to
> the
> > >>default for a column that has been changed since it was originally
> inserted.
> > >>
> > >>Ate mais,
> > >>Stuart
> > >>
> > >>Quoting David Wall <David.Wall@Yozons.com>:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Why not simply remove varcharfield2 from the INSERT statement and let
> the
> > >>>database insert that value with the default value?  Isn't the purpose of
> a
> > >>>default value to have the DB put that value in when none is specified?
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>Stuart Robinson <stuart@zapata.org>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>-------------------------------------------------
> > >>This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> --
>
> Felipe Schnack
> Analista de Sistemas
> felipes@ritterdosreis.br
> Cel.: (51)91287530
> Linux Counter #281893
>
> Faculdade Ritter dos Reis
> www.ritterdosreis.br
> felipes@ritterdosreis.br
> Fone/Fax.: (51)32303328
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>


--
Stuart Robinson <stuart@zapata.org>


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/