Re: Hot Backup - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: Hot Backup
Date
Msg-id 1035470520.12582.7.camel@camel
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot Backup  (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>)
Responses Re: Hot Backup
List pgsql-general
I think you missed the part of the thread where the nuclear bomb hit the
data center.  hmm... maybe it wasn't a nuclear bomb, but it was getting
there. :-)

BTW - I believe we'll have real PITR in 7.4, about 6 months away.

Robert Treat

On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 10:34, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:40:44AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > Is it me or do doomsdays scenarios sometimes seem a little silly? I'd
>
> Not if your contract requires five-nines reliablility and no more
> than 180 minutes of downtime _ever_.  Is five-nines realistic?  For
> most purposes, probably not, according to recent pronouncements (see,
> e.g. <http://www.bcr.com/bcrmag/2002/05/p22.asp>).  But it's in
> lots of contracts anyway.
>
> > like to ask just where are you storing your "incremental backups" with
> > Oracle/m$ sql ?? If it's on the same drive, then when you drive craps
>
> The more or less standard way of doing this is to stream the
> PITR-required stuff to another device on another controller -- lots
> of people stream to tape.  People have been doing this for ages,
> partly because disks used to be (a) expensive and (b) unreliable.
>




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Fernando Papa"
Date:
Subject: heap_blks_hit and heap_blks_read
Next
From: Jeffrey Melloy
Date:
Subject: Re: Perl DBD::Pg problem