Re: Bison 1.50 was released - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Copeland
Subject Re: Bison 1.50 was released
Date
Msg-id 1034260742.4862.23.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bison 1.50 was released  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Oh, that's right.  I had forgotten that it wasn't for general PostgreSQL
use.  Since it's a ecpg deal only, I guess I remove my objection.


Greg


On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 09:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net> writes:
> > Can we please hold off until bison 1.50 becomes a defacto?
>
> We don't have a whole lot of choice, unless you prefer releasing a
> broken or crippled ecpg with 7.3.
>
> In practice this only affects people who pull sources from CVS, anyway.
> If you use a tarball then you'll get prebuilt bison output.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Bison 1.50 was released
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] inline newNode()