Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Date
Msg-id 1031594119.268.67.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue  (Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> existed, had a brief discussion on the subject, and couldn't reach an
> agreement. That's ok for me, I understand... but releasing versions
> known to be broken is something I can't understand.-9' the postmaster

If we didn't do that, then Postgresql never would have been released in
the first place, nor any date between then and now.

There has been, and currently is a ton of known broken, wonky, or
incomplete stuff -- but it's felt that the current version has a lot
more to offer than the previous version, so it's being released.

This works for *all* software.  If you never release, nothing gets
better.


I suspect it'll be several more major releases before we begin to
consider it approaching completely functional.

--  Rod Taylor



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Script to compute random page cost
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue