Re: 7.2.2 bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: 7.2.2 bug?
Date
Msg-id 1031087789.43658.69.camel@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.2.2 bug?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 7.2.2 bug?
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 16:42, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca> writes:
> > DEBUG:  server process (pid 9097) was terminated by signal 10
> 
> Could we have a backtrace from that core dump?
> 
> AFAICT it's getting through the WAL redo just fine, so the problem
> is (probably) not what you think.

Took me a while, but I eventually figured out that they changed the
NAMEDATALEN in the old version, and didn't match it in the new one.

So the error is exactly what is expected -- memory allocation errors.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2.2 bug?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2.2 bug?