Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Date
Msg-id 1026689.1605767019@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
I wrote:
> So my vote would be to rip it out, not document it.  Somebody can try
> again in future, perhaps.  But if we document it we're just locking
> ourselves into a SQL incompatibility.

Apparently, somebody already had that thought.  See func.sgml
lines 765-782, which were commented out by 8272fc3f7.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: don't allocate HashAgg hash tables when running explain only