On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 10:29, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Rod Taylor wrote:
> > > > I prefer ...add constraint. After a while (release or 2) removal of
> > > > create unique index all together.
> > >
> > > Remove CREATE UNIQUE INDEX entirely? Why?
> >
> > I was looking to encourage users to use core SQL as I spend more time
> > than I want converting between systems -- thanks in part to users who
> > create non-portable structures.
> >
> > Temporarily forgot there are index types other than btree :)
>
> Not so much non-btree, but non-unique indexes themselves. UNIQUE index
> is funny because it is a constraint and an performance utility. I see
> your point that a constraint is more ANSI standard, but because we can't
Yup. Makes sense. I submitted a patch which retains the difference.
If the index is created with CREATE UNIQUE, it's dumped with CREATE
UNIQUE. Constraint UNIQUE is treated likewise.
