On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 10:27, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca> writes:
> > I noticed that SERIAL sequences aren't dropping with the application of
> > the patch.
>
> > Was this intentional?
>
> Yeah, the dependency isn't stored yet. I didn't like the way you did
> that, and was trying to think of a better way...
>
> More generally, a lot of dependencies that should be in place aren't
> yet. I committed as soon as I had stable functionality that more or
> less duplicated the former behavior; there's more patch still to review.
I eventually figured that out. I had only initially noticed a couple of
missing items which would have been easy to miss.
