Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ?? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??
Date
Msg-id 1014315681.1966.27.camel@rh72.home.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 01:11, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > I know how it's pronounced, I never said anything to the contrary! The
> > actual fact that there is a need for the pronunciation on the webpage
> > hints at my point - it's a real mouthful!
> >
> > And as I said this was a 'whimsical' post - I don't really care either
> > way what the name is... But i'm sure most people shorten it to
> > Postgres.
>
> I shorten it to PgSQL, and just 'pronounce' the letters *shrug*

I often omit the the -gre- part so it comes out as PostSQL - most people
never notice..

> Postgres is a different project, with a different Query langauge ...

Postgres 95 is what - a different project with the same query language,
or the same project with a different name?

Of course we should have gone the industry standard way - first to
Postgres 98, then 5.0/2000 and then XP :)

Btw there are rumours that the next version of Windows will be based on
relational data storage thus they too will reach WindowSQL soon. Hah!

-------------
Hannu


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [LARGE] select * from cursor foo
Next
From: "soetebeer.com"
Date:
Subject: Problems with the lower() and upper() functions and umlaut chars in 7.2