On 11/3/22 15:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> Seems reasonable, so done (I fixed one additional spot you missed).
Thanks!
> The bigger picture here is that we do actually endeavor to keep
> (most of) our headers C++ clean, but our tool cpluspluscheck misses
> these problems because it doesn't try to use these macros.
> I wonder whether there is a way to do better.
What about having a custom header alongside cpluspluscheck which
references all macros we care about?
We could start with the really big macros like the ones from
simplehash.h and add as we go.
I could give this a try if deemed useful.
--
David Geier
(ServiceNow)
