-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wrote:
> Uh, who exactly agreed to that? I know when I do \df it's generally
> to check out built-in functions not my own. I don't see this as an
> improvement.
Quoting Tom Lane:
> I thought the "S" suggestion was much better than this.
>
> Personally I am not unhappy with the existing behavior, because (unlike
> Greg I guess) I use \df and \do to look at system definitions all the
> time. However I'm willing to accept \dfS on the grounds of symmetry
> with the behavior for tables. I don't really want to put up with a less
> convenient behavior *and* a gratuitously different syntax.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?H1FC12BCA [Google groups]
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200504010705
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFCTTlivJuQZxSWSsgRAn7MAJ4ntKAaoWfg02iNzGxaenwkTcQTvACgnAxM
w5eM8PTJ7G40CezTkBmS/DM=
=D7yf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
